Archives

New Heaters Added – Infrared Fireplaces

Amish Style Infrared Heaters

Amish Style Infrared Heaters - Click to View/Purchase

Do you want the look and feel of a real fireplace but not the maintenance? With pre-assembled AHP’s Amish style electric infrared fireplace you can enjoy a warm and cozy night by the fire in any room since there is no vent needed.

Our Amish style electric infrared fireplaces cover up to 3 times the area of traditional portable fireplaces. They will heat up to 800 square feet and come with a 2 room-size setting thermostat and a remote control for your convenience. In house testing has shown our fireplaces are 36% more efficient then forced air electric, 64% more efficient then propane and 46% more efficient then electric baseboard yet the AHP’s Infrared fireplace only uses up to 1500 watts which is no more then a common coffee maker!

The AHP electrical infrared fireplace is a breakthrough in safety and infrared heating technology. Unlike other types of heaters which can release carbon monoxide into the air, our electric infrared fireplaces do not burn fossil fuels.

Our electric infrared fireplaces come with a 3 year limited warranty. Select your fireplace in dark oak, natural oak or our black finish option.

Dark Oak Amish Style Infrared Fireplace Heater
Available in Black, Dark Oak (pictured) or Natural

10 Great Reasons to Own an Infrared Fireplace:

  • 1. It is not just an Electronic Fireplace, it is an Infrared Fireplace
  • 2. Infrared Technology is Extremely Efficient
  • 3. Save up to 50% on your heating bill
  • 4. Heats Up to 800 Square Feet
  • 5. Will Not Reduce Humidity Or Oxygen
  • 6. Heats The Room Evenly Floor To Ceiling
  • 7. Inspected and Approved by UL a Benchmark in Safety
  • 8. Safe Around Children And Pets
  • 9. Will Not Start a Fire
  • 10. Looks Nice in Any Room Settings

FEATURES:

  • Built-in Digital thermostat, LED control with remote.
  • Heats up to 800 square feet.
  • Powerful yet quiet scroll fan.
  • No venting or chimney required.
  • Mantle is made of furniture grade plywood, not MDF.
  • Realistic fire simulation with pro ven popularity in North America.
  • Two heating level setting for large and small room size.
  • UL approval. File # E325948.
  • No assembly required. One piece pre-assembled packaging.

SPECIFICATIONS:

  • 12.6 amps, 1500 watts. Use conventional 3-prong grounded outlet
  • Three 500 watts commercial grade infrared heating elements
  • Rated at approximately 5100 BTU
  • 6 foot power cord
  • Insert dimension: 21″H X 24″W X 10″D
  • Dimension with mantle 25-1/2″H X 32″W X 12″D
  • Packaged dimension 28-1/2″H x 35-1/2″W X 15-1/2″D
  • Weight with mantle: 52 lbs
  • Packaged weight with mantle: 61 lbs

Compare Advanced Home Products Infrared Fireplace with the Infrared Heater and Amish Fireplace

Infrared Fireplace Infrared Heater Regular “Amish” fireplace
Heat output 115-120 degree higher than ambient 115 to 120 degree higher than ambient 90 to 95 degree higher than ambient
Area can be heated
As supplemental heater Up to 800 square feet Up to 800 square feet Up to 600 square feet
As only heating source Up to 500 square feet Up to 500 square feet Up to 350 square feet
Heating elements 3 quartz infrared heating elements 4 to 6 quartz infrared heating elements One Coil heating element, or PTC heating element
Thermo-stat Built-in digital thermostat Built-in digital thermostat No thermo-stat
Realistic Fire Effect Yes No Yes
Safety Safe around children and pets Safe around children and pets Safe around children and pets
Warranty 3 years 3 years 1 year
Cabinet / mantle Furniture grade plywood with wood veneer Plastic or MDF Wood

You can Purchase These Great Heaters Here

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Facebook

AirAndAqua.com Now Carrying Berkey Water Purification Systems

Berkey Water Purification Systems

Authorized Berkey Dealer

NEW to AirAndAqua.com – Berkey® Water Purifiers

Berkey® Systems are a MUST HAVE for emergencies and are virtually the most powerful and economical systems for Everyday Use.

Now you can enjoy practically the Most Delicious, Freshest, Healthiest drinking water possible for pennies a day…

Berkey Water Purifiers

Berkey® Systems are the World’s Most Powerful and Cost Effective Personal Water purification Systems Providing Reliable and User-friendly Water Purification in Both Normal and Hostile Filtration Environments.

Moreover, Berkey® systems are capable of purifying both treated water and untreated raw water from such sources as remote lakes, streams, stagnant ponds and water supplies in foreign countries, where regulations may be substandard at best. So powerful, this system is able to remove red food coloring from water without removing the beneficial minerals your body needs. Perfect for everyday use and a must in hostile environments where electricity, water pressure or treated water may not be available.

Berkey® Natural Purification Systems are the ultimate in water purification and the ideal personal protection and traveling companions. Used worldwide for normal, hostile and emergency environments to provide the purest, sparkling clean water possible…

For generations, health-conscious people around the world have recognized that the foundation to a healthy life and healthy body is clean, fresh drinking water. This important essential element is the basis for enjoying your longest, healthiest life. No amount of vitamins or supplements can substitute for the vital life-sustaining properties found in nourishing, healthful drinking water. It is truly the foundation of life.

Unfortunately, securing your access to good tasting, sparkling, wholesome drinking water can be harder than you might expect. Water is often laced with chlorine, lead, high levels of harmful bacteria, and other unwanted chemicals and contaminants. Frequently these produce unpleasant tastes and odors. Even bottled water can contain these same contaminants, and moreover it is very expensive. Other filtration systems are inferior. Most do not remove pathogenic bacteria and many remove the beneficial minerals that your body needs.

Perhaps that’s why Berkey® systems have long been recognized as the world’s ultimate in water purification. This simple, highly effective method of using gravity was developed almost 200 years ago… yet it still produces some of the finest, most healthful drinking water available.

How Berkey® Natural Water Purifiers Operate:

To use, water is poured into the upper chamber. Gravity draws this water through the exclusive purification elements where contaminates are captured on and within theses micro-porous elements and are separated from the water. The purified water then collects in the lower chamber where it can be drawn through the spigot. What’s more, Berkey® elements are cleanable and can be used over and over again.

FEATURES AND BENEFITS

  • HEALTHY – Berkey® systems are far superior to other filtration systems because they remove viruses, harmful pathogenic bacteria, cysts and parasites as well as unhealthy chemical contaminates and impurities while leaving in the essential minerals your body needs. Berkey® systems produce virtually the most healthful, clean and delicious water available.
  • CONVENIENT – Berkey® systems assemble in minutes without tools, electricity, water pressure, or plumbing. What’s more, they are simple to operate and maintain.
  • ECONOMICAL – Berkey® systems are easily the most economical water purification system you can own. Their unique design allows you to easily remove and clean the purification elements over and over again.
  • POWERFUL – Berkey® systems can easily purify ordinary tap water, yet are so powerful, they efficiently purify raw, untreated water from such sources as remote lakes and streams. What’s more, Berkey® systems are the ideal water purification systems to have on hand in the event of natural disasters such as blackouts, hurricanes, floods, earthquakes as well as local or national emergencies when treated tap water may not be available.
  • FLEXIBLE – Berkey® systems are so convenient and easy to use, you can take them anywhere: on vacations, hunting and camping trips, college dorms and they are ideal systems for RVs and pleasure craft.
  • ELEGANT - The elegant high-grade polished 304 stainless steel design makes Berkey® systems an attractive addition to any kitchen or home yet each system is both rugged and durable.
  • PROVEN HISTORY - The same high quality and effectiveness of the gravity filtration process, that is utilized in Berkey® systems, has stood the test of time. Gravity filtration has been used by relief organizations such as UNICEF, the Peace Corps, Red Cross Societies Internationally, missionaries and relief workers in over 140 countries throughout the world.

Berkey® Really is the Ultimate in Water Purification!

View Berkey Water Purification Systems Here

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Facebook

Help put an end to water fluoridation by signing official ‘We the People’ petition

Source: (NaturalNews – Ethan A. Huff)

The Fluoride Action Network (FAN), a nonprofit group dedicated to ending the practice of artificial water fluoridation, has created an official petition aimed at putting a stop to federal government support of fluoridation, and eventually ending the harmful practice altogether. But in order to get an official government response, FAN must receive at least 5,000 signatures by October 26, 2011.

The White House recently created a new online portal called We the Peoplethat lets Americans voice their concerns and requests through petitions. Anyone can create a petition and, if a petition reaches or exceeds the minimum signature threshold, the government says it will issue an official response to it, and may even decide to comply with its requests.

Sign Water Fluoridation Ban Petition

Sign Water Fluoridation Ban Petition

Ever since the controversial practice of water fluoridation first began in the US around 1945, many medical experts, including dentists, have decried it as ineffective and dangerous. Topical fluoride treatments, which some say help to prevent tooth decay, are far different from actually ingesting fluoride chemicals — and yet the government continues to peddle the lie that drinking fluoride helps improve oral health.

But this flimsy house of cards is collapsing, and people are learning the truth about fluoride. Many towns and communities across the US have stopped fluoridating their water in recent days, despite the federal government’s position that water fluoridation is one of the “ten great public health achievements” of the 20th century (http://www.fluoridealert.org/commun…).

The FAN petition correctly points out that consuming fluoride is dangerous, and can cause dental fluorosis, lowered IQ, and bone cancer, among other diseases. Nearly half of American children between the ages of 12 and 15 suffer from dental fluorosis, for instance, which is actually a form of tooth rot that visibly discolors teeth.

Adding fluoride chemicals to water supplies is also a form of forced medication, as the substances added have never been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as safe. In fact, the US government’s National Research Council (NRC) admits that young children, the elderly, and those with certain health conditions are especially prone to damage caused by fluoride ingestion.

As of this writing, FAN has already achieved more than 62 percent of the 5,000 signatures it needs to get an official government response to its petition. With your help, FAN will not only reach the 5,000 signatures by October 26, but will greatly exceed it, sending a clear message to the Feds that the people do not want fluoride in their water.

To view and sign the FAN petition, visit:
https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petition/prohibit-all-federal-agencies-promoting-endorsing-or-funding-fluoridation-public-drinking-water/SRYL4NwC

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Facebook

Top 10 Water Myths

Courtesy of EcoloBlue


Myth #1 – There’s nothing in my tap that could really hurt me or my family.

FALSE: Studies show that many contaminants can be found in water from industrial chemicals to pharmaceutical wastes and residues, not to mention toxic heavy metals.

 

Myth #2 – I should drink Eight 8 ounce glasses of water a day.

FALSE: It is a good idea to flush your body’s system with water to remain hydrated during the day but there are some things you should think about before picking up your first glass.

 

Myth #3 – Fluoride must be good for me if it’s in my water.

FALSE: Fluoride is a toxic chemical that is the basic ingredient in many rat poisons, Sarin nerve gas, and psychiatric drugs . Learn more about fluoride here: AirAndAqua Fluoride Blog

 

Myth #4 – Bottled Water, the healthier choice.

FALSE: There are more than just a few factors that immediately can dispel this myth, from companies using tap water and calling it healthier, to chemicals leeching from the very bottles that the water is stored in. Learn more about Bottled Water here: Dangerous Bottled WaterToxic Chemicals in Drinking Water

 

Myth #5 – Aquifers are a renewable resource.

FALSE: Aquifers, although historically plentiful, are depleting across the world at an alarming rate.

 

Myth #6 – Spring or Mineral Water is healthier because it is more natural.

FALSE: Many companies have been passing tap water off as spring or mineral water for years but also natural springs can easily be contaminated all the way up until you take that fateful sip .

 

Myth #7 – America’s Water Infrastructure is sound.

FALSE: Daily there are destructive collapses of potable water infrastructures all across our country. The reason? Corrosion and material instability leading to the question how and when can we fix the problem AND with what money?

 

Myth #8 – Runoff is a problem that faces farms and river areas but not my home.

FALSE: Water runoff affects all natural water systems across the globe because water lives in various forms at any given time as part of our Water Cycle.

 

Myth #9 – All Water Filters are created equal.

FALSE: There are many kinds of filters that can be had for variable prices depending on what you are seeking to take out or add into your water but often no matter which you chose it will not remove all the pollutants. Until now.

 

Myth #10 – Your body runs on Hydrogen.

TRUE: No other element (no, not even oxygen) is as important to living tissue, water creation, and the make up of the universe.

 

View AirAndAqua.com’s selection of Water Purification Systems Here: http://www.airandaqua.com/sunshop/index.php?l=product_list&c=5

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Facebook

Civil rights group adopts resolution opposing water fluoridation

Source: Ethan A. Huff, NaturalNews.com

” Water fluoridation is one of the greatest cons ever perpetrated against society (it’s actually not natural fluoride they use but a toxic waste byproduct of the phosphate mining industry). ”

The days of artificial water fluoridation truly are numbered, and this has been made even more evident by yet another prominent group that has come out in strong opposition to the heinous practice. The Fluoride Action Network (FAN), a truth about fluoride advocacy group, reports that the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), the oldest Hispanic civil rights organization in the US, recently adopted a resolution decrying water fluoridation as a civil rights abuse.

Fluoride in Drinking Water Comic

Fluoride is Toxic Poison.

The resolution declares that adding fluoride to water supplies is essentially an illegal mass medication of the public. It also mentions the many current scientific studies that highlight the dangers of ingesting fluoride, particularly among those with pre-existing health conditions — and that public health authorities have ignored this science in favor of their unscientific, pro-fluoride agenda (http://lulac.org/advocacy/resolutio…).

“This is about forcing us to be medicated through our drinking water without our consent or full disclosure of the risks,” said Henry Rodriguez, civil rights chairman of the Texas-based LULAC. His group is vehemently working to end the practice of water fluoridation across the US, where more than 64 percent of public water supplies are fluoridated (http://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/sta…).

“Opposition to fluoridation is going to continue building and there is no stopping it. There are millions of Hispanics and other minorities in the US who don’t have the funds to avoid fluoridated water for making their babies’ milk formula. And millions of families don’t know they’re being medicated in their drinking water, or about possible risks for kidney patients and diabetics.”

Based on decades-worth of statistics released by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), water fluoridation has provided no substantial oral benefits for those consuming it. Particularly in the Hispanic community, many of those drinking fluoridated water still have plenty of cavities — but they also now have high rates of dental fluorosis, a condition where teeth become brittle, mottled, and brown as a result of fluoride ingestion.

“Watch what develops now as members of the Hispanic legal community are awakening to this issue,” said Daniel G. Stockin from The Lillie Center Inc., another group working to end water fluoridation. “The train has left the station. Fluoridation is ending. You can look for a quickening cascade of cities, water utilities, health officials and others distancing themselves from fluoridation.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Facebook

State says VY tritium found in Connecticut River

Entergy challenges test results, says levels of radioactive isotope are undetectable

By Olga Peters/The Commons

Originally published in The Commons issue #115 (Wednesday, August 24, 2011).

VERNON—The Vermont Department of Health announced on Aug. 17 that laboratory tests revealed low levels of the radioactive isotope tritium on the Connecticut River’s shoreline adjacent to the Vermont Yankee nuclear power station.

“We have been tracking the plume of tritium-contaminated groundwater as it moves slowly toward the river, and this new finding confirms that the tritium has traveled from the Yankee site to the Connecticut River,” said Health Commissioner Harry Chen, M.D.

Although less than one-third the safety threshold set by the Environmental Protection Agency, the samples were “above the limited level of detection so we consider [the test results] real,” said Dr. William Irwin, DOH radiological health chief and deputy director for planning.

When asked if the tritium posed a danger to the public, Irwin answered, “No. Absolutely not.”

Radioactive Water

Radioactive Water

As it enters the Connecticut, the tritiated groundwater “rapidly mixes” with the river water and dilutes, he said.

Tritium levels at the DOH’s approximately six sampling sites upstream and downstream of VY remain “undetectable,” said Irwin.

Entergy has released a statement challenging the DOH’s results, saying that the plant’s independent testing of the same river water samples did not show detectable levels of the isotope.

Irwin said the DOH has “always described” the ground water at VY contaminated with the tritium leak as “moving slowly to the river.”

The tritium, a radioactive form of hydrogen that emerged in a sample taken from a VY test well in November 2009, has not shown up in any sources of drinking water off-site, said Irwin.

In January 2010, VY confirmed that tritiated water had leaked from underground pipes near the Advanced Off-Gas (AOG) Building. Later lab tests also revealed radioactive isotopes strontium-90, cesium-137, and cobalt-60 in the soils surrounding the leak.

The Connecticut River test samples represent the first instance of tritium reaching the river. Theses results could substantiate the theory that the leak at VY started in 2007, said Irwin.

The timeframe fits projections based on the distance from the first monitoring well showing tritiated water in 2009 to the leak’s source, said Irwin.

The department collected the river water from a testing point near the shoreline next to the plant in Vernon, an “ideal” location for “capturing the tritium as it moves” into the Connecticut, Irwin said.

The sample was split, with half taken by the health department for testing and the other half sent to a lab used by VY’s owner, Entergy.

According to Irwin, the health department’s tests showed levels slightly above the lower level of the lab instruments’ detection ability of 500 picocuries per liter. The first sample collected July 18 measured 611 pCi/L, and the second collected July 25 measured 534 pCi/L.

The federal Environmental Protection Agency’s acceptable limit for drinking water is 20,000 pCi/L, said Irwin.

The hydrogeology of the VY site, like most nuclear plants near water, drains toward the river, said Irwin. The groundwater closest to the Connecticut “communicates” by rising and falling to similar levels as it flows from the soil to the river.

According to Irwin, the department collected the tritiated samples from a hose in the river located about four feet under the water.

For the past 18 months this “sample port” has monitored the groundwater flowing into the river. The DOH collects samples from this port weekly, he said.

What groundwater VY did not extract from the soils surrounding the leak site “was going to end up in the river,” Irwin said.

So far, the tritium levels in the plant’s 31 monitoring wells have followed a pattern of peaking, then declining, said Irwin.

The July river levels will likely follow the same pattern as the tritium “makes its final exit from the land within the next year or so,” he said.

Entergy issued a statement through VY spokesperson Larry Smith refuting the DOH’s findings.

“Results from our laboratory testing of those same samples, however, show levels that are below that same extreme lower limit, otherwise known as below ’minimum detectable,’” read the statement.

“While it is important to note that the levels detected are extremely low, and there is no risk to the environment or public health and safety, we are very interested in working with the State to understand the discrepancy in the test results,” wrote Entergy.

“As such, we have proposed to the State that we send both our samples and theirs to an independent third party laboratory for an additional round of testing,” the company wrote.

According to the statement, the company has expedited three weeks of test results from its laboratory and continues to pump groundwater from around the AOG leak.

To date, VY has extracted 334,900 gallons of groundwater, said Smith.

Vermont Gov. Peter Shumlin issued a statement saying, “I am very concerned about the latest findings from the Vermont Health Department. Confirmation that tritium has reached the shoreline of the Connecticut River is further evidence of the immediate need for more extraction wells and increased monitoring of the situation.”

According to Shumlin’s statement, the governor wrote plant officials on Aug. 3 calling for an increase in the number of extraction wells to prevent contamination from the nuclear facility from reaching the river or groundwater supplies.

He also instructed the DOH to obtain weekly water samples from the Connecticut River at the shoreline and other locations in the river.

According to Irwin, the DOH is considering sampling the water around VY more frequently to gather additional data.

“The more samples you get, the better conclusions you can draw,” he said, adding the department will continue testing other areas of the environment for radioactive contamination, such as air and soil.

Earlier this month, the DOH reported finding the radioactive isotope strontium-90 in “edible portions” (the flesh) of fish captured nine miles upstream of VY [The Commons, Aug. 10].

Chen said the DOH had received laboratory results “confirming the accuracy of that finding” on Aug. 17.

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Facebook

Medicine in Drinking Water Supply: An Emerging Concern

Source: Dr Md Rajib HossainTheDailyStar.net

While millions of people in the world are struggling to access safe drinking water, drugs contamination in the supply water has been emerging as a rising concern.

More than 100 different types of medicine have been detected in lakes, rivers, reservoirs and streams throughout the world — Asia, Australia, Canada, Europe, USA — even in Swiss lakes and the North Sea.

The concentrations of prescription drugs and over the counter drugs in the water supply are very low and far below the levels of a medical dose. But the presence of so many drugs in drinking water is heightening worries among scientists for long-term consequences to human health.

Medicine in Drinking Water

Medicine in the Drinking Water Supply

According to World Health Organisation (WHO), medicine can be introduced into water sources through sewage, which carries the excreta of individuals and patients who have used these chemo-therapeutic agents, from uncontrolled drug disposal (e.g. discarding expired drugs into toilets) and from agricultural runoff comprising livestock manure. Most tap water is not treated in a way that can get out pharmaceutical drugs or if treated they do not remove all drug residue.

Experts are investigating the possible long term health effects of drinking such water. Current observations suggest — it is very unlikely that exposure to very low levels of pharmaceutical products in drinking-water would result in appreciable adverse risks to human health. But it could be an emerging public health problem if the concentration rises and also for wildlife.

The most appropriate approach to minimise the presence of pharmaceutical products in drinking-water and reduce human exposure is to prevent or reduce their entry into water bodies as far as reasonably practical.

According to WHO, concentration of the vast majority of pharmaceutical drugs into the water bodies can be reduced through natural processes (e.g. adsorption onto sediment, solar photo-degradation and biological degradation) or during subsequent drinking-water and wastewater treatment processes.

Conventional water treatment processes, such as chlorination can also reduce the burden half and improved system to treat water will help preventing entry of drugs into water supply chain.

Drugs in drinking water are emerging. We need to act before it evolves as a major public health problem.

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Facebook

CNN Reports: EPA to set limits on chemicals in drinking water

(CNN) — The Environmental Protection Agency will set a limit on the amount of the chemical perchlorate, as well as other “toxic contaminants,” in drinking water, it announced Wednesday.

The national regulation on perchlorate will reverse a 2008 decision made by President George W. Bush’s administration, the agency said in a statement. It comes after EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson ordered agency scientists to review “the emerging science of perchlorate.”

Toxic Chemicals in Drinking Water

Toxic Chemicals in Drinking Water

“There’s going to be a lot of scrutiny of the standard because, again, we are looking at but one of several precursors that can affect iodine uptake in the thyroid,” Jackson told CNN’s Chief Medical correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta. “It’s the first time we’ve ever regulated a chemical not because of what it does directly to you, but because it has an impact on iodine uptake that might affect your child down the road.”

Perchlorate is both a naturally occurring and man-made chemical, according to the EPA. It is used in fireworks, road flares, rocket fuel and may be present in bleach and some fertilizers, the agency said. Research has indicated that it can impact the thyroid and disrupt the proper development of fetuses and infants.

Some states have already established limits on perchlorate in drinking water, but there has been no national standard.

However, monitoring data shows more than 4% of public water systems have detected perchlorate and between 5 and 17 million people may be served drinking water containing it, the EPA said.

The decision was made after considering input from nearly 39,000 public comments, the agency said. Once the EPA proposes a formal rule, it will be subject to the public comment process.

In addition, the EPA is also establishing a drinking water standard on “a group of up to 16 other toxic chemicals that may cause cancer and pose serious risks to human health,” the statement said.

The chemicals are a group of volatile organic compounds, such as industrial solvents, and include trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene, along with other regulated and some unregulated substances “discharged from industrial operations.”

The move is part of a Drinking Water Strategy laid out by Jackson last year, the agency said. The strategy included addressing contaminants as a group so that their presence in drinking water could be addressed “cost-effectively.”

“Today’s action delivers on the promise to strengthen public health protection from contaminants in drinking water,” according to the EPA. “The aim is to find solutions that meet the health and economic needs of communities across the country more effectively than the current approach.”

Jackson said in the statement she believes the decision will spark new innovations. “As improved standards are developed and put in place, America’s world-leading clean water technology innovators have an opportunity to create cutting edge solutions that will strengthen health protections and spark economic growth.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Facebook

Black Pastors Association Leader Calls Water Fluoridation a “Civil Rights and Environmental Justice Issue”

Re-post from Fluoride Follies @ FluorideFreeAustin.com: M. Rae Nadler-Olenick

Rev. William Owens, President of the Memphis-based Coalition of African American Pastors, has issued a press release denouncing CDC’s failure to inform African American leaders of the negative health impacts of fluoride, which fall disproportionally on minority, poor, and inner-city communities.

Water fluoridation has historically been implemented in the name of benefiting those same communities.

Rev. Owens called for investigations of the decades-old web of federal and state-level deceit and misconduct surrounding the fluoridation issue, which he termed “Fluoridegate.”

Fluoride Follies salutes his bold stand.

Reverend William Owens

Reverend William Owens

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Facebook

Government recommends lowering fluoride levels in U.S. drinking water

Source: Saundra Young, CNN.com
Editor’s Note: We want ZERO fluoride in the water supply. Not a reduction! Fluoride has a bio-accumulation effect ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioaccumulation ) which adds up in your bones and body over time. Fluoride is poisonous to ingest, for proof of this, just turn over a tube of fluoridated toothpaste to read the warning label; “If consumed please contact the poison control center”. Please view more of our articles on why consuming fluoride is not only bad but toxic: http://www.airandaqua.com/blogs/?s=fluoride
– Also, please consider a filter from AirAndAqua.com that will remove fluoride from your home/office water supply at http://www.airandaqua.com/sunshop/index.php?l=product_list&c=44
The American Dental Association says the new recommended fluoride levels will reduce tooth decay.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • There has been an increase in a condition called fluorosis
  • It causes spotting and streaking on children’s teeth
  • The ADA says the new levels will still reduce tooth decay but minimize fluorosis
  • Fluoride was first added to U.S. drinking water in the 1940s

(CNN) — The federal government is recommending changing the amount of fluoride in drinking water for the first time in 50 years.

The Department of Health and Human Services and Environmental Protection Agency are proposing the change because of an increase in fluorosis — a condition that causes spotting and streaking on children’s teeth.

Fluoride is Poison

Fluoride is Poison - Source: infowars.com

The government is proposing that the recommended amount of fluoride in drinking water be set at 0.7 milligrams per liter of water. The recommended range has been 0.7 to 1.2 milligrams per liter since 1962. The EPA will determine whether the maximum amount of fluoride allowed in water will also be lowered.

Fluoride was first added to water in the United States in the 1940s to help prevent tooth decay in children 8 years and under.

“One of water fluoridation’s biggest advantages is that it benefits all residents of a community — at home, work, school or play,” said Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary for Health Dr. Howard Koh. “And fluoridation’s effectiveness in preventing tooth decay is not limited to children, but extends throughout life, resulting in improved oral health.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says dental fluorosis is highest among adolescents between the ages of 12 an 15. One reason for the increase in fluorosis: Americans now have access to fluoride from a variety of sources, including toothpaste, mouth rinses and prescription supplements, the Department of Health and Human Services says

“Dental fluorosis in the United States appears mostly in the very mild form — as barely visible lacy white markings or spots on the enamel,” The department said in a statement Friday. “The severe form of dental fluorosis, with staining and pitting on the tooth surface, is rare in the United States.”

The change is being made now, according to an administration official, because the current range is out of date. He said that in the 1960s, when fluoridating water began, air conditioning was much less common. So children in hotter regions drank more water and needed lower levels of fluoride to protect their teeth, while children in colder climates drank less water and needed higher levels.

“Now since air conditioning is so common,” the official said, “you don’t see those differences in consumption, and that’s why they’re getting rid of the range and recommending one level.”

The American Dental Association says the new recommended levels will still reduce tooth decay but minimize fluorosis. The group says it continues to support fluoridation of community water as a safe and effective way to prevent tooth decay.

“This is a superb example of a government agency fulfilling its mission to protect and enhance the health of the American people,” said ADA President Dr. Raymond F. Gist. “We have always looked to the federal health agencies to guide us on this and other public health matters, and we will continue to do so. We applaud the Department of Health and Human Services for reaffirming the safety and efficacy of optimal community water fluoridation, with science on their side.”

The Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit organization whose goal is to protect public health and the environment, says it has been pushing governmental officials to reduce fluroide levels for years.

“We’ve had to wait too long, but the government’s official, belated — and perhaps begrudging — announcement marks its recognition that fluoride policies have been out of step with the science on the tap-water additive’s toxicity to children, and that many American children are at risk from excess fluoride in drinking water and other sources,” said Jane Houlihan, senior vice president for research at the Environmental Working Group.

“Since 2005, EWG has been calling on federal agencies to respond to these findings, which come from National Academy of Sciences and many others, documenting that excess fluoride exposure poses dangers that range from discolored teeth to potential hormone disruption and neurotoxicity. HHS has taken an important first step. Now it’s up to water utilities to respond and for the EPA to lower its high, legal limit on fluoride in drinking water, which is more than five times higher than the new maximum recommended amount.”

The recommendations have been submitted to the Federal Register for a 30-day public comment period. The final version is expected this spring.

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Facebook